Recent Founder’s Effect, bottlenecking and 6 Tahitian women on Pitcairn island

I finally got the autosomal results of a Pitcairn resident who has been a member of the Polynesian project for a year now.  Previously I had another member who is a Norfolk island descendant and whose ancestors moved to Norfolk but were originally from Pitcairn.  Another Norfolk descendant tested at another company, but his raw data were uploaded to GEDmatch.com in order to be compared.  Now having that this particular Pitcairn resident tested, I can make a comparison for these 3 people since they all have ties to Pitcairn.

 

HISTORY OF PITCAIRN ISLAND

Pitcairn was settled in 1790 by mutineers of the HMS Bounty and Tahitians1.  The initial population of 27 consisted of 9 mutineers, 6 Tahitian men and 11 Tahitian women along with an infant girl.  Only 6 of the mutineers and 6 Tahitian women would produced descendants.

Mutineers:
1) Fletcher Christian
2) Edward Ned Young
3) John Mills
4) William McCoy
5) Matthew Quintal
6) John Adams

Tahitian women:
1) Mauatua
2) Teraura
3) Teio
4) Tevarua2
5) Vahineatua
6) Toofaiti

 

POPULATION GROWTH, DECREASE & RE-POPULATION

The population started with 27 people but only 12 of them would produce descendants.  By 1840 the population exceeded 100, and by the mid-1850s the community was outgrowing the island3.

On May 3, 1850 the entire community left for a 5 week trip and settled on the island of Norfolk on June 8.  Nearly 3 years later 16 of them returned to Pitcairn.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 9.03.27 AM

 

EFFECTS WITH AUTOSOMAL DNA

I have mentioned in previous blog entries that eastern Polynesians are genetically less diverse than western Polynesians.  So it should be no surprise that Hawaiians and Maoris as well as Tahitians will come up as closer matches to each other despite sharing common ancestors 8 centuries ago.

Now we are looking at two things.  Firstly, a founding population where only 12 people produced offspring, and half of the 12 being Tahitian women, or eastern Polynesians.  And these 12 were not paired off equally.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 9.32.29 AM

They married multiple times, some of them never produced descendants with their other spouses.

Secondly, there was a population bottleneck in 1859.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 9.35.35 AM

In 1856 the population expanded to 193, then the entire population left.  That population was already interrelated just 66 years after the initial 12 founding people started the population.  They all left, but 16 of them returned.  Eventually a few more returned but the remaining population continued life on Norfolk island while the rest of the Pitcairns were starting the population again. It would take only 23 years to repopulate the island increasing the population to 250.

 

ANALYZING A PITCAIRN RESIDENT’S AUTOSOMAL DNA

The Pitcairn resident descends from all of the 12 founding people.  No surprise given that small amount plus that was just 225 years ago and 7 generations ago for this particular person.

Although I cannot show with a family tree how many times they descend from the 12 founding people due to size and the complexity of the tree, I decided to list the number of times they descend from each of the 12.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 9.50.22 AM

This resident’s paternal grandparents are 2nd cousins one way, and 3rd cousins another way while their maternal grandparents were 2nd cousins two ways.  There are more ways that they are related going further back as well, but my genealogy software cannot pick up the multiple relationships and it seems to select the closest relationship but selected 2nd cousin once removed, so not sure which line it was picking up.  This person’s maternal grandfather was born on Pitcairn but there is no known genealogy for him.  For their other grandparents, here is who they descend from.  (Founding people in bold)

Paternal grandfather – Christopher Warren, son of George Warren whose mother was Agnes Christian, and Alice Butler whose mother was Alice McCoy.
Paternal grandmother – Mary Christian, daughter of Sidney Christian & Ethel Young.
Maternal grandmother – Ivy Young, daughter of William Young & Mercy Young.

Agnes Christian and Alice McCoy were 2nd cousins, great-granddaughters of Fletcher Christian and Mauatua.  Ivy Young’s parents William and Mercy Young were 2nd cousins two ways to each other.  Great-grandchildren of Edward N. Young and Toofaiti and of Fletcher Christian and Mauatua.

As confusing as it seems, you can imagine how would DNA would show up.  After uploading the raw data to GEDmatch.com for further analysis, I immediately ran the “Are Your Parents Related” tool.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 10.07.52 AM

It predicted 3.3 for the most recent common ancestor (MRCA).  Still not sure how to interpret GEDmatch’s MRCA estimation, but in reality the most recent common ancestor would be their 2nd great-grandparents – Thursday October Christian II and Mary Polly Young.  And there were other Youngs as I previously mentioned and Christians as well.

When I ran my mother’s kit through that same tool, her largest segment was 13.9cM, and there were a total of 5 segments that would total 51.5cM.

Largest segment = 13.9 cM
Total of segments > 7 cM = 51.5 cM
Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 4.1

Unlike the Pitcairn resident whose largest segment was 24.7cM and with 11 segments.  My mother’s parents were from different islands and as far back as I was able to trace their ancestries, they did not intersect nor did their ancestors come remotely near to each other given that they were from 3 different islands.

I would love to get more Pitcairn residents to test, to see if there is any noticeable pattern using this tool, or David Pike’s ROH.  If there is, we definitely could use it in helping to determine a true close genetic match versus an endogamous one.

 

COMPARING TO NORFOLK DESCENDANTS

There are 2 particular matches to many of the Polynesian DNA project’s members and both of these 2 people are descendants of Norfolk residents.  I will refer to them as Norfolk #1 and Norfolk #2.

Norfolk #1’s maternal grandmother was from Norfolk and she was the daughter of Francis Nobbs and Ruth Christian.  Norfolk #2’s maternal grandfather was from there, and his parents were William Adams and Sarah Christian.

A further breakdown where I bold the founding people.

NORFOLK #1
Francis Nobbs’ ancestry, son of Alfred Nobbs & Mary Christian:
Paternal grandfather – George Nobbs
Paternal grandmother – Sarah Christian, daughter of Charles Christian & Tevarua
Maternal grandfather – Benjamin Christian, son of John Buffett & Mary Christian
Maternal grandmother – Eliza Quintal, daughter of John Quintal & Maria Christian

Sarah and Maria Christian were daughters of Charles Christian & Tevarua, while Mary Christian was their 1st cousin.

Ruth Christian’s ancestry, daughter of Isaac Christian & Miriam Young:
Paternal grandfather – Charles Christian, son of Fletcher Christian & Mauatua
Paternal grandmother – Tevarua, daughter of Teio
Maternal grandfather – William Young, son of Edward N. Young & Toofaiti
Maternal grandmother – Elizabeth Mills, daughter of John Mills & Vahineatua

NORFOLK #2
William Adams’ ancestry, son of John Adams & Caroline Quintal:
Paternal grandfather – George Adams, son of John Adams & Teio
Paternal grandmother – Polly Young, daughter of Edward N. Young & Toofaiti
Maternal grandfather – Arthur Quintal, son of Matthew Quintal & Tevarua
Maternal grandmother – Catherine McCoy, daughter of William McCoy & Teio

When comparing the two Norfolk descendants to the Pitcairn resident, I was surprised to see no overlapping segments.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 1.36.43 PM

Screen Shot 2015-12-22 at 12.58.16 PM

It is interesting to see how for Norfolk #1, the largest segment is 40.85cM for the largest segment and a total of 134.5cM.  The largest segment is significant, and although Pitcairn & Norfolk #1 are related multiple ways, the closest known relationship makes them 4th cousin once removed.

Comparing Pitcairn to Norfolk #2, the largest segment is 27.3cM, which for Polynesians in general could be pretty distant.  Total shared is 95.1cM.  And just as with Norfolk #1, Norfolk #2 and Pitcairn are related multiple ways, but the closest relationship makes them 4th cousins.

At the moment I cannot compare Norfolk #1 and Norfolk #2, but I am trying to get one that taken care of in order to upload Norfolk #1’s raw data to GEDmatch for further analysis.

I was expecting to see the overlap at least when comparing to the Pitcairn resident given that their ancestors’ have been on the island since the beginning, but it goes to show how unpredictable and random DNA can be.

A list of all 3 and how many times they each descend from the following founding population.

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 1.46.23 PM

And while various Polynesians can be compared to all three of these people and may show overlapping segments, there is really no way to map these segments.  These 3 testees would match other project members based on segments inherited by one or more of these 6 Tahitian women that settled on Pitcairn.  And we all would have shared common ancestor(s) from at least 8 centuries ago.

Below I compare the Pitcairn resident to a Hawaiian, a Maori and a Cook Island Maori as well as my Hawaiian mother.  Incidentally, there is a project member whose father was from Tahiti, yet that person does not come up as a match.

(default setting)

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 3.40.11 PM

(1+cM setting)

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 3.48.43 PM

 

Comparing Norfolk #1 with the same people with the exception of not being a match to the Cook Island Maori.

(default setting)

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 3.41.18 PM

(1+cM setting)

Screen Shot 2015-12-21 at 3.51.14 PM

Norfolk #2 did not test at FTDNA but at 23andme, and although their raw data was uploaded to GEDmatch.com, all the others being compared were not uploaded except for my mother’s raw data.

For additional information about the DNA study of the descendants of the Mutiny on the Bounty, see ‘Mutiny on the Bounty’: the genetic history of Norfolk Island reveals extreme gender-biased admixture.

Footnotes

1. History of the Pitcairn Islands.
2. Pitcairn Settlers lists an additional Tahitian woman known as Sully, as the wife of Matthew Quintal and the mother of Matthew Jr., John, Arthur, Sarah and Jane Quintal. Another source as well as the Pitcairn resident who got DNA tested claim that there were only 6 Tahitian woman of whom they descend from.  There was no mention of Sully, although Tevarua is listed as being married to Matthew Quintal and the parents of  Matthew Jr., John, Arthur, Sarah and Jane Quintal.
3. Historical Population of Pitcairn.

Advertisements

26 thoughts on “Recent Founder’s Effect, bottlenecking and 6 Tahitian women on Pitcairn island

  1. Hello,
    On GEDMatch I share DNA with Kalani – Pitcairn Resident. I found your blog in my search to learn more about Pitcairn, its people, and DNA. Thank you for this post!

    Like

      • I’m a Pitcairn descendant and awaiting results of a 23andme DNA test. I’m 6th great grandson of Fletcher Christian, John Mills, Edward Young, Mauatua, Vahineatua, Toofaiti and 5th great grandson of Teraura. These are through my maternal grandmother who was born on the island. Will the results contribute to your research in any way?

        Like

      • Hi Chris! When you get your results, contact me. You can upload your raw data to gedmatch.com for free. That way you can see a few other Pitcairn descendants there too. But be sure to let me know when you get your results & we can upload your raw data to that site I mentioned, then we can compare all the descendants eventually, which will probably be in a future blog.

        Like

      • Hi Kalani, I mentioned above about being a Pitcairn descendent and waiting for a DNA result. I’ve got that now and uploaded the data to gedmatch. Let me know if you’d like more information.

        Like

      • Hi Chris! I saw you on my mom’s list. A very distant 16.2cM of course. 🙂 You showed up on my mom’s list, but I couldn’t see yours. It’s not done processing yet.

        Like

      • Chris…the Pitcairn resident’s kit # is T041126, you two share 164cM. That’s quite a bit. Largest segment is 30cM, that’s around a 2nd or 3rd cousin, although multiple times. Except I don’t know where your family is from recently. Norfolk? And was it one or two grandparents?

        Like

      • Thanks Chris! I use this site extensively. Email me & I can give you more info on the match mentioned in the blog. mamoahina and it’s at g mail dot com.

        Like

  2. Then I am going to assume that is how you are related. I’ve never traced it beyond those men to see how far back their lines go. But in my example for the Pitcairn resident, they are a McCoy twice and Adams twice, but through the same founding McCoy & Adams person. So I guess that would just make them have different segments from that founding ancestor in their DNA that just so happens to match you.

    Like

  3. Just now found this blog. My grandson is engaged to a girl who is 50% Hawaiian, so hopefully, she will test in the future and we can learn about her historical heritage.

    Like

  4. Hi Kalani,
    I accidentally found your site while searching for results on Agnes Christian I am 8th generation. My ancestor was Thursday October Christian my daughter is related to Charles Christian on her fathers side. Both sons of Fletcher Christian. I would be interested to learn more about the DNA testing.
    Thanks
    Robyn

    Like

    • Hi Robyn,

      FTDNA just started a sale on their autosomal (called FAMILY FINDER) test beginning today. http://ftdna.com

      Some people have tested at Ancestry.com instead where they have an actual “Polynesia” category that can give a much more definite (although not always exactly accurate) percentage of your Polynesian side. At both places you can match up to other descendants of Fletcher Christian.

      Ancestry.com DNA kits cost more but they will probably have a sale after next week Thursday.

      Aloha,
      Kalani

      Like

      • Thanks
        In your opinion would it be better for my daughter to do the test as her father and her mother are related to fletcher Christian. Or being a generation before her should I do the test where just my father is a decendant.

        Thanks
        Robyn

        Like

      • Robyn….definitely a generation before. Since both of her parents are descendants, they should test. Definitely get her tested as well, that way you can see how since both of her parents are descendants, what was passed on to their daughter. That’s if you all are interested, but I definitely can help with interpreting your results. Currently, FamilyTreeDNA.com has a US$59 sale for their “Family Finder” test, where Ancestry.com is currently US$99. Next week Friday however day after Thanksgiving there will probably be a sale for Ancestry.com. Not sure if FamilyTreeDNA would do the same since it already is a sale price.

        Like

      • Ancestry is the only one that has a POLYNESIA category. Any other admixture you may have (European), I hear bad things about myOrigins (FTDNA) compared to Ancestry. To me, 23andme was much more specific but their kits never go on sale. Well, they have the medical portion which is on sale but not the other ancestry part.

        Like

      • Yes I ended up going with Ancestry. I will be surprised if it doesn’t come out like I expect. Will send you a message when I get it, it’s going to be a long 6 weeks.

        Like

  5. E Kalani, kiaora kiaora, just stumbled on this site and wondered if you have any info on a database or agency of another sort that helps Pitcairn descendents who have moved to the main land? My family has a good background with Norfolk and Chatham Islanders having lived and worked on the islands in the past despite not being related, and have
    met some pitcairn descendents in
    this manner, but some are having troubles with ancestry and admixture, as well as intergrating into the bigger islands here with the mass of different nationalities, different healthcare and development stages etc. I wondered if you knew of any cultural or trust groups that had formed? or anyone who had an interest in starting such a thing. The church is not much help here, more of an exasberating factor lol … You will see that its relevant to your descendency, with gene adaption in isolation etc as well as you get more info to work with and medical info to match.

    Like

    • Kia ora te Pi’, by main land do you mean Hawai’i, Tahiti, New Zealand or somewhere else? If NZ, there’s an active group of Pitcairn descendants and twice yearly gatherings in Wellington. There’s a facebook group for descendants to keep in touch too if you’re on there.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s